Popper · falsifiable hypothesis compiler

Method

Popper treats a hypothesis as a compiled artifact. A traditional compiler turns source code into an executable that must pass tests. Popper turns literature into a hypothesis that must pass validation.

Literature → Knowledge Compiler → Hypothesis → Validation

The falsifiable hypothesis schema

A hypothesis is admitted only if it is structurally falsifiable. Missing an independent variable, a falsification condition, a quantitative prediction, or a source id is not a stylistic lapse — it is a compile error. Required fields:

The four scores

Composite is the geometric mean of the applicable scores. A zero in any dimension tanks the composite — by design. A beautifully written but ungrounded hypothesis must not score well.

The benchmark

Rediscovery (Group A): real historical discoveries (CRISPR-Cas9, nucleoside-modified mRNA, CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade). We remove the discovery paper, hand the compiler only the prior literature, and ask whether it reconstructs the leap.

Attractive nonsense (Group B): historical dead ends (cold fusion, phlogiston) whose narratives fit the prior evidence. A trustworthy system must not rank these highly.

Controls: random traversal (noise floor), keyword co-occurrence (statistics baseline), and llm-only (no corpus). The compiler must beat all three on the same input, or the central claim fails.

Local-first

Every generation, audit, and score is produced by a 35B model running on the author's own hardware via an OpenAI-compatible endpoint — no cloud APIs, no keys. The whole point is a scientific instrument you can own, inspect, and rerun.